What do you notice first about Miss Grace Ashburner? Maybe her porcelain-white skin highlighted by pink cheeks? Her fashionably powered hair decorated by a shiny blue ribbon? Or maybe her smart green coat with bright brass buttons? This portrait of Grace, painted by fashionable English portraitist George Romney , shows her wistfully gazing off in the distance. In , the year of the painting, Grace would have turned She is certainly the epitome of a lovely young lady of late eighteenth century England.
Would it surprise you to learn that, just five years later, Grace was involved in a love triangle that resulted in a scandalous trial? The story first broke in a number of English newspapers in late June Notices appear all over the county, from Kent southeast of London, to Chester near Liverpool, to Norfolk on the east coast, to Staffordshire in the Midlands.
It even made the newspapers in Ireland. Then, when the civil jury trial happened in September, more newspapers took up the story. There even exists a pamphlet that captures all of the details. It sold for twopence and had as its title:. View of Mrs.
The exhibition opened to the public on Sunday, December 18th and will run throughout the spring. The seven creative and up-and-coming student curators in this course researched and developed the innovative installations found in this exhibition in order to expand and enhance Mrs. Each student was assigned an object to research and install in the cabinet as part of the museum studies course.
Their challenge was to create an installation that fit in with the theme of Mrs. Oil on canvas. Milwaukee Art Museum, Gift of Mr. William D. Kyle, Sr. Photo credit: John R. Imagine it is the early 18th century. You are an Italian noble and need to decorate your villa. But, again, all things that matter remain obstinately unequal: you've got to explain why it isn't Shakespeare before you attempt to prove why it is the earl of Oxford.
An old tradition may be false, but in your way it lies. So Russell's Teapot is no more than a cute version of the idea that the burden of proof rests with the believer, not with the sceptic. It's a fair point. But equally fair is the believer's retort that the burden of self-proof rests with the greenhorn, not with the veteran. In the history of human thought, neo-Darwinian atheism is the new kid on the block and, if this book is anything to go by, it has yet to prove itself to the 'hood.
As a critic of faith, Dawkins is thus pretty lame; as the bard of materialist myth, his only rival is Philip Pullman. Correctly perceiving that the tenacity of religious belief is hard to explain in terms of natural selection, he comes up with two theories.
The comparatively uninspired one is that religion is perpetuated by children imbibing the false with the true from their parents' teaching; the other, closely allied to the first but much more interesting, is that religion represents a "misfiring" of essentially sound evolutionary instincts.
He takes the example of moths flying into candle flame; not a particularly sound instinct for survival evinced there, you would think. But as Dawkins tells us, moths are used to steering themselves by moonlight, and that they do perfectly well. Candlelight, being more intense than moonlight, fatally distracts them. Already, as you can see, this example is starting to look more like an analogy, but Dawkins is a mythologist, so why worry?
The whole theory loses its charm somewhat as you read of pity and compassion also being "misfirings" of the sexual instinct. His famously selfish genes get an outing, as do their cultural cousins, memes. There's something dark and rich and wonderful in the idea that at any moment one's limbs are being jerked into motion by microscopic strings of DNA, puppeteered by the spectres of a false cultural consensus. I wish he could see that, far from destroying the pantheon, he has enriched it; that the One God now has two tiny angels to assist him.
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies. Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later?
We keep having to add rooms to accommodate them all. This house is years old and has been used as everything from a post office to a general store and a few other things in between so between the tea pots, the house and us, you could say there's a bit of history between these walls. We used to live up the road at Boyup Brook but we moved down here for a bit of peace and quiet.
You can really see the stars at night out here. Why tea pots? Why not? Some of the ones we have you can hear the history in them. We have a twelve cupper that was used on a sheep station up north, you could imagine some of the conversations that used to go down around that. We get busloads of tourists come by for a look. We give them a cup of tea and a home made slice and they're free to wander around as long as they like.
It's amazing how many times someone will come up and say 'We used to have that exact same tea pot at home when I was a kid. Topics: human-interest , rural-tourism , community-and-society , regional , dinninup First posted January 22, More stories from Western Australia.
If you have inside knowledge of a topic in the news, contact the ABC. ABC teams share the story behind the story and insights into the making of digital, TV and radio content. Read about our editorial guiding principles and the standards ABC journalists and content makers follow. Learn more. By Ahmed Yussuf.
0コメント